Maggert v. Call

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant waived claims because he failed to provide a cogent argument
• holding that where Maggert’s civil action was for the theft of his property and not a challenge to his conviction or a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Maggert had no federal constitutional right of access to the law library

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).