Seventh Circuit· 7/23/1998

Majors v. Engelbrecht

Citations

149 F.3d 709
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 16910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[s]ubsequent judicial review is a sufficient opportunity” to “raise constitutional challenges”
“That the regulation and licensing of healthcare professionals is an important matter of state concern is beyond dispute.”
for Younger abstention purposes, administra- tive proceedings are judicial in nature when they are coercive, such as state enforcement proceedings
“For purposes of Younger abstention, administrative proceedings are ‘judicial in nature’ when they are coercive—i.e., state enforcement proceedings[.]”
“For purposes of Younger abstention, administrative proceedings are ‘judicial in nature’ when they are coercive—i.e., state enforcement proceedings, as opposed to remedial, or legislative.”
“[A]dministrative proceedings are ‘judicial in nature’ when they are coercive -- i.e., state enforcement proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.