Paul E. Bettencourt, M.D. v. Board of Registration in Medicine of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that staff members have absolute immunity for roles in assisting with the drafting of an order or in advising the board to impose sanctions
• ruling that quasi-judicial immunity attaches to members of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine with respect to their adjudicatory role in disciplinary proceedings
• ruling that quasi-judicial immunity attaches to members of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine with respect to their adjudicatory role in disciplinary proceedings
• ruling that quasi-judicial immunity attaches to members of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine with respect to their adjudicatory role in disciplinary proceedings
• holding that medical board’s general counsel was entitled to absolute immunity from damages actions for his role in advising the board
• holding that board officials are A court in this district determined that members of the Oregon Medical Board (formerly the Board of Medical Examiners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).