Majors v. Engelbrecht

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[s]ubsequent judicial review is a sufficient opportunity” to “raise constitutional challenges”
• “That the regulation and licensing of healthcare professionals is an important matter of state concern is beyond dispute.”
• for Younger abstention purposes, administra- tive proceedings are judicial in nature when they are coercive, such as state enforcement proceedings
• “For purposes of Younger abstention, administrative proceedings are ‘judicial in nature’ when they are coercive—i.e., state enforcement proceedings[.]”
• “For purposes of Younger abstention, administrative proceedings are ‘judicial in nature’ when they are coercive—i.e., state enforcement proceedings, as opposed to remedial, or legislative.”
• “[A]dministrative proceedings are ‘judicial in nature’ when they are coercive -- i.e., state enforcement proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).