Gilbertson v. Albright
Citations
- 381 F.3d 965
- 4 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8169
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 18734
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[J]udicial proceedings or disciplinary proceedings which are judicial in 9 nature are the type of proceeding that does implicate an important state interest.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bybee, Fisher, Graber, Kleinfeld, Pregerson, Rawlinson, Rymer, Scannlain, Schroeder, Silverman, Wardlaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wolfe v. StrankmanNinth Circuit· 2004-12-14· cited 245×
- Rio Grande Community Health Center, Inc. v. RullanFirst Circuit· 2005-02-14· cited 206×
- San Jose Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce Political Action Committee v. City of San JoseNinth Circuit· 2008-10-14· cited 205×
- Tsai-Yi Yang v. Fu-Chiang TsuiThird Circuit· 2005-08-03· cited 166×
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightNinth Circuit· 2004-09-03· cited 163×
- AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. RodenNinth Circuit· 2007-08-13· cited 142×
- Peter Gakuba v. Charles O'BrienSeventh Circuit· 2013-03-25· cited 131×
- William King v. County of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2018-03-12· cited 121×
- Karen Logan v. Us Bank National AssociationNinth Circuit· 2013-07-16· cited 100×
- Walter Hoye, Ii v. City of OaklandNinth Circuit· 2011-07-28· cited 95×
- Massachusetts Delivery Ass'n v. CoakleyFirst Circuit· 2012-01-20· cited 79×
- Manuel Vasquez v. Tony RackauckasNinth Circuit· 2013-11-05· cited 72×
- Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. OwenNinth Circuit· 2017-10-10· cited 71×
- Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. County of San Luis ObispoNinth Circuit· 2008-11-25· cited 66×
- Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesNinth Circuit· 2007-09-21· cited 38×
- Scripsamerica, Inc. v. Ironridge Global LLCC.D. California· 2014-11-03· cited 23×
- Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting CommissionD. Arizona· 2014-04-29· cited 19×
- Los Altos El Granada Investors v. City of CapitolaNinth Circuit· 2009-10-07· cited 12×
- Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. County of San Luis ObispoNinth Circuit· 2007-09-17· cited 11×
- Hill v. CourterE.D. Virginia· 2004-11-08· cited 7×
Cites
62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,061×
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1974-03-19· cited 2,574×
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 2,418×
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 2,158×
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 1,834×
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 1,716×
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 1,688×
- Moore v. SimsSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,323×
- Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 1,215×
- Juidice v. VailSupreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,215×
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 1,137×
- Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-27· cited 887×
- Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court· 1988-01-12· cited 715×
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court· 1981-12-01· cited 712×
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 647×
- Trainor v. HernandezSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 606×
- Tower v. GloverSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 546×
Other cases named Gilbertson v. Albright
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.