Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1/8/1980
MacK v. State
Citations
- 286 N.W.2d 563
- 93 Wis. 2d 287
- 1980 Wisc. LEXIS 2405
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- departing from the waiver rule has been allowed where “there are no factual questions, the parties have fully briefed the issue and [the question posed is] of ... statewide importance”
- credit crime statute and forgery statute are not ambiguous, even though the same conduct may violate both
- prosecutor may charge felony forgery even though misdemeanor fraudulent use of a credit card applies to the same conduct
- circuit court lacks criminal subject matter jurisdiction only if complaint fails to charge a crime known to law
- if same act satisfies elements of two different crimes, neither of which is lesser-included offense of the other, defendant may be prosecuted for either or both
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Day
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. FordMichigan Supreme Court· 1987-04-08· cited 69×
- State v. UnnamedWisconsin Supreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 47×
- State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. ShanksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1985-04-04· cited 40×
- Town of Delafield v. WinkelmanWisconsin Supreme Court· 2004-03-05· cited 35×
- Kevin R. McCloud v. Jodine DeppischSeventh Circuit· 2005-06-02· cited 30×
- State v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1998-03-26· cited 21×
- R.D.K. v. Sheboygan County Social Services DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1981-10-07· cited 16×
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1999-02-04· cited 13×
- State v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court· 1983-02-03· cited 11×
- State v. MuehlenbergCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-03-27· cited 11×
- State v. OlexaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-01-21· cited 10×
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-05-25· cited 7×
- State Ex Rel. Cannon v. MoranCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1982-05-25· cited 4×
- State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-02-07· cited 4×
- State v. StrassburgCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-06-06· cited 4×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1982-09-21· cited 3×
- State v. DavisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-04-24· cited 2×
- State v. JensCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2005-01-25
- Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-03-18
- State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1998-07-30
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court· 1973-04-17· cited 3,425×
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 1,945×
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,568×
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 1,036×
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-02-28· cited 656×
- Lefkowitz v. NewsomeSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 341×
- United States v. John Christopher DoyleSecond Circuit· 1965-10-11· cited 288×
- State v. AsfoorWisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 110×
- People v. McColloughIllinois Supreme Court· 1974-05-29· cited 90×
- People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado· 1972-06-05· cited 72×
- State v. KarpinskiWisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-12-04· cited 67×
- Hawkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1965-02-02· cited 54×
- State v. VangenWashington Supreme Court· 1967-11-16· cited 38×
- State v. LampeWisconsin Supreme Court· 1965-03-02· cited 31×
- State v. GledhillSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-06-10· cited 29×
- State v. DumontCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-07-09· cited 28×
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-11-03· cited 26×
- Geitner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-06-05· cited 24×
- Dumer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1974-07-03· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.