State v. Asfoor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding prior version of the Concealed Carry Statute was not unconstitutionally vague
• affirming jury verdict that handgun on floorboard of motor vehicle was within reach
• trial court could modify jury instruction to prevent jury from being misled by counsel’s closing argument
• judge's opinion that jury would find defendant guilty, when read in context, shows there was no partiality
• \intent and negligence are mutually exclusive and one cannot intend to injure someone by negligent conduct.\
• “... one who intentionally aids and abets the commission of a crime is responsible not only for the intended crime, if it is in fact committed, but as well for other crimes which are committed as a natural and probable consequence of the intended criminal acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).