Skip to main content

State v. Briggs

Citations

  • 579 N.W.2d 783
  • 218 Wis. 2d 61
  • 1998 Wisc. App. LEXIS 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that vacating one of several convictions obtained by plea agreement required vacating the entire plea agreement
  • reasoning that vacating one of several convictions obtained by plea agreement required vacating the entire plea agreement
  • reinstating the parties to the positions they had before they negotiated a plea agreement based on an inaccurate view of the law
  • reinstating the parties to the positions they had before they negotiated a plea agreement based on an inaccurate view of the law
  • “We . . . vacate the amended information and reinstate the original information in order to restore the parties to the positions they had before they made an agreement based on an inaccurate view of the law . . . .”
  • matters of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eich, Vergeront, Roggensack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.