Skip to main content
· 11/16/1967

State v. Vangen

Citations

  • 433 P.2d 691
  • 72 Wash. 2d 548
  • 1967 Wash. LEXIS 830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the attenuation doctrine “fits the present situation with tailor-like exactness” and affirming defendant’s conviction
  • stating that the attenuation doctrine \fits the present situation with tailor-like exactness\ and affirming defendant's conviction
  • defendant was confronted with legally seized evidence against him after first refusing to confess
  • defendant was confronted with legally seized evidence against him after first refusing to confess
  • defendant confronted with legally seized evidence against him after refusing to confess
  • defendant confronted with legally seized evidence against him after refusing to confess

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.