Mack v. Mack
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2379
Syllabus
The domestic relations court's decision denying Father's request to designate him his son's residential parent for school purposes was not an abuse of discretion where it was in the child's best interest to continue Mother in that role when considering Father's frequent and prolonged absence for work and the child's familiarity with Mother's local school district. Similarly, the domestic relations court's decision modifying Father's parenting time schedule adopting a specific schedule based on Father's geographical proximity to Mother's residence was not an abuse of discretion where Father's employment and rigorous work schedule necessitated a unique parenting time schedule be adopted.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bonifield v. BonifieldOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-19· cited 15×
- In re J.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-13· cited 4×
- In re C.L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-22· cited 4×
- Blessing v. BlessingOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-30· cited 3×
- Schaible v. SchaibleOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-28· cited 3×
- Romohr v. SingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-10· cited 2×
- Bowling v. BowlingOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-01· cited 1×
- Reisinger v. ToppingOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-26· cited 1×
- Marois v. MaroisOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-16
- Corson v. CorsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-06
- Wallace v. WallaceOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-28
- Garrett v. KronkOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-10
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.