Skip to main content

Bowling v. Bowling

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1857

Syllabus

Father appeals domestic relations court decision resolving various issues between Father and Mother arising from parties' shared parenting plan (SPP). Issues involved Father's request for reimbursement for the children's expenses and Father's allegations that Mother violated an agreed order regarding communication with the children during Father's parenting time. SPP provided that parties share equally in costs of the children's extracurricular activities if they agreed to activity prior to enrollment. Father unilaterally enrolled the children in competitive cheer. Facts belied Father's claim that he believed that the parties had an agreement regarding sharing the costs of competitive cheer. Court's calculation of e expenses supported by the record. Father failed to articulate specific expense he claimed inaccurate. Court did not abuse discretion in not finding Mother in contempt for \excessively\ contacting children. Parties' agreed order did not define \excessive\ only required parties to \reduce\ communications with the children.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.