Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 7/18/2007

MacArthur v. San Juan County

Citations

  • 495 F.3d 1157
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 17010
  • 2007 WL 2045462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a litigant had inadequately briefed several issues by failing to \cite a single case relevant to the underlying argument\
  • observing that fraud-on- the-court claims must “be presented to the court in which the alleged fraud was perpetrated”
  • explaining that “mere conclusory allegations with no citations to the record or any legal authority for support does not constitute adequate briefing” (quotation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • declining to address the merits of a party’s claim where the opening brief cited only three cases
  • \Mere conclusory allegations with no citations to ... legal authority for support do[ ] not constitute adequate briefing.\ (quotations and brackets omitted)
  • “[M]ere conclusory allegations with no citations to the record . . . do[es] not constitute adequate briefing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Ebel, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named MacArthur v. San Juan County

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.