Tenth Circuit· 8/10/2010

Brooks v. Gaenzle

Citations

614 F.3d 1213
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16488
2010 WL 3122800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that federal courts generally should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a State-law claim if no viable federal claims remain
holding that federal courts generally should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a State law claim if no viable federal claims remain
recognizing that when all federal claims are dismissed before trial, a district court should generally decline to exercise pendant jurisdiction over state-law claims
recognizing that when all federal claims are dismissed before trial, a district court should generally decline to exercise pendant jurisdiction over state-law claims
holding that federal courts generally should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a State-law claim if no viable federal claims remain
explaining that federal courts should generally decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a State-law claim if no viable federal claims remain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien, Brorby, Gorsuch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Brooks v. Gaenzle

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.