Craven v. University of Colorado Hospital Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \the manner in which [the plaintiff] expressed herself to others\ bolstered the employer's interest
• “We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not preserve a claim.”
• relying on abrasive, offensive manner of employee’s speech
• applying the same rule to a sovereign immunity issue
• discussing inadequate identification of speech in appellate argument
• discussing inadequate identification of speech in appellate argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).