Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/7/2004
Lytle v. Ford Motor Co.
Citations
- 814 N.E.2d 301
- 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1764
- 2004 WL 1965674
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding exclusion of expert testimony proper where there existed \a significant analytical gap\ between the expert's data and his conclusions
- finding exclusion of expert testimony proper where there existed \a significant analytical gap\ between the expert's data and his conclusions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Friedlander, Bailey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Witte v. Mundy Ex Rel. MundyIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-01-06· cited 69×
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Estate of WagersIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-08-25· cited 30×
- Wesco Distribution, Inc. v. Arcelormittal Indiana Harbour Llc. and Espu, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2014-11-10· cited 30×
- McCutchan v. BlanckIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-04-24· cited 20×
- Shafer & Freeman Lakes Environmental Conservation Corp. v. StichnothIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-11-29· cited 16×
- Smith v. YangIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-23· cited 11×
- The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Company v. Likes Law Office, LLC Kevin L. Likes Rickey D. Whitaker and Cheryl L. WhitakerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-10-15· cited 11×
- Fueger v. Case Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-05-16· cited 9×
- F.A.C.E. Trading, Inc. v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-01-20· cited 8×
- Ruiz v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-14· cited 7×
- Carter v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-10-30· cited 7×
- Kovach v. Alpharma, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-07-16· cited 6×
- Ford Motor Co. v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-05-01· cited 4×
- Cecilia Kelly v. GEPA Hotel Owner Indianapolis LLC, GEPA Hotel Operator Indianapolis LLC, and Schindler Elevator CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-07-11· cited 3×
- Carl Summerhill v. Craig KlauerIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-31· cited 3×
- Liter's of Indiana, Inc. v. Earl E. Bennett and Daniel L. BodineIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-02-05· cited 3×
- Rea Robinson v. Radley RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals· 2019-05-13· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-10-30
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Bushong v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-06-27· cited 173×
- Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-06-23· cited 116×
- Jordan v. DeeryIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-09· cited 102×
- McGrew v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-07-08· cited 82×
- Malinski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-09-03· cited 73×
- Vernon v. Kroger Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-12· cited 62×
- PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-01-16· cited 62×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-05-27· cited 59×
- Smith v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-06-06· cited 56×
- General Motors Corp. v. Northrop Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-09-12· cited 51×
- Hannan v. Pest Control Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-08-31· cited 46×
- Armstrong v. Cerestar USA, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-17· cited 46×
- Cromer v. SeftonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-11-26· cited 46×
- Hottinger v. Trugreen Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-05-08· cited 41×
- City of Elkhart v. Agenda: Open Government, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-07-21· cited 38×
- Corbin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-11-27· cited 37×
- Lytle v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-06-30· cited 28×
- In the Matter of Estate of BelangerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-03-24· cited 26×
- Marriage of Hegerfeld v. HegerfeldIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-06-27· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.