F.A.C.E. Trading, Inc. v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no error where trial court struck expert affidavits because opinions would not have assisted trier of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Face Trading, Inc. v. Department of Consumer & Industry Services
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2006-07-07· cited 14×
• Smith v. Yang
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-23· cited 11×
• F.A.C.E. Trading, Inc. v. Todd
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-07-27· cited 8×
• Sniezek v. Colorado Department of Revenue
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-05-05· cited 5×
• Lindey v. Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-21· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Posadas De Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-01· cited 420×
• Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.
  Supreme Court· 1954-04-05· cited 208×
• Corbin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-11-27· cited 37×
• Lytle v. Ford Motor Co.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-06-30· cited 28×
• Blocher v. DeBartolo Properties Management, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-12-28· cited 23×
• Lytle v. Ford Motor Co.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-09-07· cited 23×
• Fort Wayne Lodge, LLC v. EBH CORP.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-04-06· cited 19×
• American Legion Post 1133 v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-10-31· cited 17×
• Thayer v. Vaughan
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-11-06· cited 8×
• State v. Maillard
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-06-12· cited 4×
• Jack Eiser Sales Co., Inc. v. Wilson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-07-25· cited 4×