General Motors Corp. v. Northrop Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the substantive law of California to “govern the resolution of [appellants’] common law causes of action” after finding that California had the “most intimate contacts” to the litigation
• affirming denial where amendment was sought four years after the original complaint and two years after the first amended complaint and plaintiff did not assert the discovery of new evidence that might have justified the delay 10
• \Courts do not have the power to create for the parties a contract which they did not make.\
• Indiana courts “do not have the power to create for the parties a contract which they did not make”
• \Courts do not have the power to create for the parties a contract which they did not make.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).