Skip to main content
· 11/26/1984

Cromer v. Sefton

Citations

  • 471 N.E.2d 700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]here is no duty or fiduciary relation running from the insurer to the injured plaintiff. The insurer's only duty is to the insured on its contract.\
  • “[T]here is no duty or fiduciary relation running from the insurer to the injured plaintiff. The insurer’s only duty is to the insured on its contract.”
  • “Clearly the policy of the law is to keep the issue of insurance out of personal injury litigation. The usual method ... is that the insurer file[s] a separate declaratory judgment suit to determine coverage.”
  • insurer intervention “raises serious questions of conflict of interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neal, Robertson, Ratliff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.