Skip to main content
· 3/17/1994

Krawczuk v. State

Citations

  • 634 So. 2d 1070
  • 1994 WL 81825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e hold that the court’s ruling on the motion to suppress is not cognizable on appeal.... [Even] if the issue had been preserved ... we would find it to have no merit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.