Lyashchynska v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an “adverse credibility determination coupled with a lack of corroborating evidence for a claim of persecution means that the applicant’s claim fails”
• upholding the Immigration Judge’s reliance on a Department of State investigation where the asylum applicant “did not overcome the presumption of regularity afforded to government investigations”
• “Where there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “An adverse credibility determination coupled with a lack of corroborating evidence for a claim of persecution means that the applicant’s claim fails.”
• “An adverse credibility determination coupled with a lack of corroborating evidence for a claim of persecution means that the applicant’s claim fails.”
• “Where there are two USCA11 Case: 21-12770 Date Filed: 06/27/2022 Page: 12 of 12 12 Opinion of the Court 21-12770 permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).