Wei Chen v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a tenable explanation for an inconsistency, alone, does not compel a conclusion that the applicant is credible
• holding that substantial evi- dence supported an adverse credibility determination where there were various inconsistencies
• holding that even if an asylum applicant offers tenable explanations for record- 9 USCA11 Case: 19-11984 Date Filed: 10/20/2020 Page: 10 of 10 inconsistencies, those explanations do not compel reversal of the immigration judge’s adverse credibility determination
• stating that “[a]n IJ’s denial of asylum . . . can be supported solely by an adverse credibility determination”
• explaining that the denial of asylum relief “can be supported solely by an adverse credibility determination, especially if the alien fails to produce corroborating evidence”
• explaining that “the [BIA’s] decision can be reversed only if the evidence compels a reasonable factfinder to find otherwise” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).