Ishmail A. D-Muhumed v. U.S. Atty. Gen.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petitioner unable to meet the standard of proof for asylum cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal
• holding that a petitioner must establish that it is “more likely than not” that she would be persecuted upon removal for a withholding of re- moval claim
• noting that an applicant who cannot establish that he qualifies for asylum cannot meet the “more stringent” standard for withholding of removal
• noting that the standard for withholding of removal is “more stringent than the ‘well- founded fear’ standard for asylum”
• noting that the standard for withholding of removal is “more stringent than the ‘well-founded fear’ standard for asylum”
• explaining that because applicant “cannot meet the ‘well-founded fear’ standard for asylum, it is a fortiori that he cannot meet the withholding of removal standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).