Chesnel Forgue v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an applicant’s omission of relevant political activity from his asylum application provided substantial evidence in support of the IJ’s adverse credibility finding
• holding that “menacing telephone calls and threats” did not rise to the level of past persecution
• holding that threats to petitioner and her brother did not compel reversal of IJ's decision
• holding that an alien must show that he will be singled out for persecution on account of a protected ground in the asylum context
• holding that in light of an applicant’s omission of various relevant facts from his asylum application, “substantial evidence supported] the IJ’s adverse credibility determination”
• holding that in light of an applicant’s omission of various relevant facts from his asylum application, “substantial evidence supported] the IJ’s adverse credibility determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).