Razkane v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the IJ’s stereotypical assumptions were “unhinged from the prerequisite of substantial evidence” and would “inevitably lead to unpredictable, inconsistent, and unreviewable results”
• censuring an IJ for relying on his own misguided stereotypes of gay men
• censuring an IJ for relying on his own misguided stereotypes of gay men

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).