Skip to main content
N.D. New York· 3/31/2006

Lugosch v. Congel

Citations

  • 443 F. Supp. 2d 254
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22145
  • 2006 WL 2270348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that particular deference is due where “the magistrate judge has been deeply involved in discovery matters in the case for years’’
  • noting that particular deference is due where “the magistrate judge has been deeply involved in discovery matters in the case for years”
  • particular deference due where “the magistrate judge has been deeply involved in discovery matters in the case for years”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mordue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.