Second Circuit· 12/5/1997
United States v. Trapilo
Citations
- 130 F.3d 547
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 34155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that revenue rule did not bar prosecution of a money laundering scheme to defraud the Canadian government of tax revenue
- “Whether our decision today indirectly assists our Canadian neighbors in keeping smugglers at bay or assists them in the collections of taxes, is not our Court’s concern.”
- “Because the act of smuggling violates fundamental notions of honesty, fair play and right dealing, it is an act within the meaning of a ‘scheme to defraud.’ ”
- “The scheme exists although no misrepresentation of fact is made.” (quotation marks omitted)
- “[W]hat is proscribed is [the] use of the telecommunication systems of the United States in furtherance of a scheme” to defraud, and the “identity and location of the victim . . . are irrelevant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pasquantino v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-04-26· cited 291×
- United States v. FregaNinth Circuit· 1999-06-08· cited 204×
- Empire Merchants, LLC v. Reliable Churchill LLLPSecond Circuit· 2018-08-28· cited 120×
- United States v. MandellSecond Circuit· 2014-05-16· cited 78×
- United States v. Vassilios K. HandakasSecond Circuit· 2002-03-22· cited 64×
- Attorney General of Canada v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.Second Circuit· 2001-10-12· cited 54×
- Schnell v. Conseco, Inc.S.D. New York· 1999-03-31· cited 26×
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternS.D. New York· 2013-02-11· cited 17×
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank JuliusDistrict of Columbia· 2017-04-27· cited 14×
- In Re Sumitomo Copper LitigationS.D. New York· 2000-07-12· cited 10×
- Lugosch v. CongelN.D. New York· 2006-03-31· cited 10×
- European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.Second Circuit· 2005-09-13· cited 10×
- United States v. ChalmersS.D. New York· 2007-02-22· cited 9×
- Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. OAO SamaraneftegazS.D. New York· 2013-08-06· cited 9×
- United States v. HanDistrict of Columbia· 2017-12-01· cited 8×
- United States v. MartinS.D. New York· 2006-01-19· cited 5×
- United States v. HayesS.D. New York· 2015-03-20· cited 4×
- United States v. ValleS.D. New York· 2014-06-30· cited 4×
- United States v. AliE.D. New York· 2008-03-07· cited 3×
- United States v. TurnerE.D. New York· 2009-05-04· cited 1×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,362×
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 1,314×
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 856×
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court· 1994-01-24· cited 661×
- United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleySecond Circuit· 1991-07-30· cited 170×
- United States v. John Von BartaSecond Circuit· 1980-11-25· cited 154×
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. AlcornSupreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 138×
- Seventy-two Thousand, Nine Hundred & Forty Dollars in United States Currency v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-10-02· cited 136×
- McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.First Circuit· 1990-06-01· cited 121×
- United States v. Oscar PorcelliSecond Circuit· 1989-01-11· cited 75×
- United States v. Paul Defiore, Joseph Coppola and Robert GallerSecond Circuit· 1983-11-02· cited 74×
- United States v. Frank Slevin, William LeslieSecond Circuit· 1996-12-18· cited 73×
- United States v. BootsFirst Circuit· 1996-03-29· cited 69×
- McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc.Supreme Court· 1990-11-26· cited 66×
- United States v. Kaare Gilboe, Jr.Second Circuit· 1982-08-24· cited 53×
- United States v. John Robert RagostaSecond Circuit· 1992-07-23· cited 52×
- Gilboe v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 48×
- United States v. Garrison M. Everett and Richard I. ChiraNinth Circuit· 1983-03-28· cited 41×
- United States v. Gerald W. Eskow and Fred H. MacKensenSecond Circuit· 1970-02-27· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.