Lugosch v. Congel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff’s factual assertions as to the defendant’s willfulness, as pleaded in the complaint, were sufficient to trigger a three-year limitations period
• noting that “the merits of plaintiffs’ claims . . . are irrelevant to the conditional class certification inquiry”
• noting that plaintiff need only assert “a plausible basis for the claim” at the conditional certification inquiry
• applying a three-year limitations period despite the defendants’ arguments that a two-year limitations period should apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).