Discon, Incorporated v. Nynex Corporation, Nynex Material Enterprises, New York Telephone Company, Robert J. Eckenrode, and Bernard O'Reilly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that three corporate defendants operating “within a unified corporate structure” and “guided by a single corporate consciousness” could not together constitute'the enterprise
• involving complaint alleging that corporate subsidiaries were “persons” and subsidiaries, taken together as parent, were “enterprise”
• dismissing Section 1962(b) claim because plaintiff failed to “allege a ‘use or investment injury’ that is distinct from the injuries resulting from predicate acts”
• involving complaint alleging that corporate subsidiaries were \persons\ and subsidiaries, taken together as parent, were \enterprise\
• naming three corporations collectively as an enterprise and one corporation as a defendant is not permissible
• defendant may be held liable for monopolization under Section 2 only if the defendant itself competed directly in that market

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).