Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A patentee may rely on either direct or circumstantial evidence to prove infringement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-01· cited 180×
• Alcon Research, Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-03-18· cited 103×
• Bell Bci Co. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-25· cited 58×
• Broadcom Corporation v. Emulex Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2013-10-07· cited 46×
• Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. AOL, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2011-04-18· cited 38×
• Anascape, Ltd. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-04-13· cited 29×
• West Bay Builders, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-11-26· cited 14×
• SRI International Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2009-08-20· cited 12×
• Ormco Corp. v. Align Technology, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2009-02-23· cited 8×
• EnOcean GmbH v. Face International Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2014-01-31· cited 6×
• Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Delphi Corp.
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-03-09· cited 5×
• Shaw v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2017-03-31· cited 4×
• Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2014-02-21· cited 3×
• Eurand, Inc. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-02-01· cited 2×
• Alcon Research Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2011-12-13· cited 2×
• Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-09-10
• ADT Holdings, Inc. v. Harris
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2017-09-28
• Bluegrass Lodge Apartments, Ltd. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2020-05-04
• E&I Global Energy Services, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2021-04-15
• State of Ohio v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2021-06-21

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Waterman v. MacKenzie
  Supreme Court· 1891-02-02· cited 598×
• Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1997-03-04· cited 309×
• Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1986-05-16· cited 283×
• Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of Hawaii
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-09-30· cited 265×
• The Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly and Company
  Federal Circuit· 1997-10-24· cited 260×
• Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Group, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-04-18· cited 248×
• PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-04-11· cited 217×
• ACCO Brands, Inc. v. ABA Locks Manufacturer Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-09-12· cited 170×
• James D. Wallace v. City of San Diego City of San Diego Police Department
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-02-12· cited 133×
• Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. Vaughan Company, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-06-01· cited 132×
• Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-10-03· cited 111×
• Biomedino, LLC v. Waters Technologies Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2007-06-18· cited 103×
• St. Christopher Associates, L.P. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2008-01-09· cited 92×
• Israel Bio-Engineering Project v. Amgen Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-01-29· cited 64×
• Collegenet, Inc. v. Applyyourself, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 63×
• United States v. 4.0 Acres of Land
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-05-04· cited 63×
• Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-05-08· cited 57×
• Pope Manufacturing Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court· 1892-04-04· cited 53×
• E-Pass Technologies v. 3com Corporation (Also Known as 3com)
  Federal Circuit· 2007-01-12· cited 47×
• Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.
  S.D. California· 2007-08-06· cited 5×