Federal Circuit· 4/18/2011
Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. AOL, LLC
Citations
- 641 F.3d 1331
- 98 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1393
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 7896
- 2011 WL 1458662
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to add language that did not appear in patent and whose addition was not obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art
- “[T]he parties agreed that ‘only if has a common meaning, but then proceeded to dispute the scope of that claim term.”
- affirming district court’s finding of indefiniteness as to eight claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gajarsa, Linn, Dyk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.Federal Circuit· 2014-02-21· cited 80×
- Mastermine Software, Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationFederal Circuit· 2017-10-30· cited 55×
- Ultimatepointer, L.L.C. v. Nintendo Co LtdFederal Circuit· 2016-03-01· cited 51×
- Thompson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-10-13· cited 32×
- Alexsam, Inc. v. Idt CorporationFederal Circuit· 2013-05-20· cited 21×
- Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.Federal Circuit· 2015-06-23· cited 21×
- uPI Semiconductor Corp. v. International Trade CommissionFederal Circuit· 2014-09-25· cited 8×
- VR Optics, LLC v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.S.D. Illinois· 2018-11-05· cited 8×
- Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.E.D. Virginia· 2013-09-25· cited 4×
- High Point Sarl v. T-mobile USA, Inc.D. New Jersey· 2014-10-15· cited 3×
- Rates Technology Inc. v. Broadvox Holding Co.S.D. New York· 2014-01-28· cited 2×
- UltimatePointer, LLC v. Nintendo Co.W.D. Washington· 2014-12-22· cited 2×
- Eurand, Inc. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2013-02-01· cited 2×
- Davis Wetlands Bank, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-10-31· cited 1×
- Audio MPEG, Inc. v. Dell Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2017-08-09· cited 1×
- Spahn v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesFederal Claims· 2017-07-31
- Medtronic Minimed Inc. v. Animas Corp.C.D. California· 2014-05-08
- CSB-System International Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-04-02
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- John D. Watts v. Xl Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2000-11-14· cited 193×
- Shelley K. Cole v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationFederal Circuit· 1997-02-18· cited 188×
- Atmel Corporation v. Information Storage Devices, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1999-12-28· cited 185×
- Net MoneyIN, Inc. v. VeriSign, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-10-20· cited 171×
- Ipxl Holdings, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-11-21· cited 132×
- Novo Industries, L.P., Plaintiff-Cross v. Micro Molds Corporation, and Oscar HelverFederal Circuit· 2003-12-05· cited 119×
- Chef America, Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2004-02-20· cited 118×
- Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-06-09· cited 111×
- Ultimax Cement Manufacturing Corp. v. CTS Cement Manufacturing Corp.Federal Circuit· 2009-12-03· cited 67×
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-09-25· cited 40×
- Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-01-05· cited 32×
- Rembrandt Data Technologies, Lp v. Aol, LLCE.D. Virginia· 2009-08-21· cited 3×
Other cases named Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. AOL, LLC
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.