Collegenet, Inc. v. Applyyourself, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analogizing automatic processes that contemplate human intervention such as an automatic dishwasher which “automatically” washes dishes but must be loaded and turned on by a human
• rejecting defendant’s construction of “automatically” as “without human intervention” as too preclusive because the claim language did not prohibit human interaction entirely to initiate automated functions
• “In examining the specification for proper context, however, this court will not at any time import limitations from the specification into the claims.”
• “In 13 examining the specification for proper context, however, this court will not at any time import limitations from the specification into the claims.”
• “In examining the specification for proper context, however, this court will not at any time import limitations from the specification into the claims.”
• “In examining the specification for proper context, however, this court will not at any time import limitations from the specification into the claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).