Skip to main content
· 3/21/1994

Luboyeski v. Hill

Citations

  • 872 P.2d 353
  • 117 N.M. 380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice of appeal divested trial court of jurisdiction to grant pending motion to amend complaint
  • holding that individual defendants could not be named for the first time in district court
  • holding that “when a defendant is sued under the Human Rights Act the plaintiff must exhaust her or his administrative remedies before bringing an action in district eourt.”
  • holding that notice of appeal divested trial court of jurisdiction to enter an order granting motion to amend complaint because such an order could affect the judgment that had been appealed
  • affirming the dismissal of individual defendants because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies against them
  • affirming the dismissal of individual defendants because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies against them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montgomery, Baca, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.