Mitchell-Carr v. McLendon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that compliance with NMHRA exhaustion procedures is “effective to give the district court jurisdiction” over a NMHRA claim
• explaining that issue of exhaustion under NMHRA is “a jurisdictional issue”
• describing as a “grievance procedure” the process of filing a complaint with NMHRD
• “An order of non-determination signals that the person who filed the complaint has fully complied with the NMHRA grievance procedure and may proceed to Court.”
• “[E]xhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite to suit under the NMHRA, and a failure to exhaust administrative remedies may mean that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdietion.”
• “[E]xhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite to suit under the NMHRA, and a failure to exhaust administrative remedies may mean the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).