Skip to main content
· 4/10/1996

Sabella v. Manor Care, Inc.

Citations

  • 915 P.2d 901
  • 121 N.M. 596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “under the alleged facts of [that] case, a claim of [sexual harassment] under the [Human Rights Act] is not barred by the WCA.”
  • ruling that a complaint filed with the EEOC is deemed to have been properly filed with the New Mexico Human Rights Division
  • allowing a person to maintain her NMHRA claim in district court based on the fact that she had requested and received an order of non-determination from the NMHRD
  • worker’s action against employer for sex discrimination under New Mexico Human Rights Act not barred by exclusivity provisions of the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Frost, Minzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.