Skip to main content

Cruz v. State

Citations

  • 963 A.2d 1184
  • 407 Md. 202
  • 2009 Md. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a supplemental closing argument would not have cured the problem created by the court's eleventh hour insertion of a new theory of culpability
  • finding prejudice where the jury was presented with a new theory of culpability after closing arguments
  • finding prejudice where the jury was presented with a new theory of culpability after closing arguments
  • reviewing cases involving supplemental jury instructions giving new theories of liability
  • finding abuse of discretion when court gave “the jury a supplemental instruction on attempted battery during the jury’s deliberations, because the court at the close of evidence indicated that it would only instruct the jury on battery, the sole theory . . . elected by the State.”
  • “We are not persuaded that a supplemental closing argument would have cured the problem created by the court’s eleventh hour insertion of this new theory of culpability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins, Battaglia, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.