Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/23/2009
Cruz v. State
Citations
- 963 A.2d 1184
- 407 Md. 202
- 2009 Md. LEXIS 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a supplemental closing argument would not have cured the problem created by the court's eleventh hour insertion of a new theory of culpability
- finding prejudice where the jury was presented with a new theory of culpability after closing arguments
- finding prejudice where the jury was presented with a new theory of culpability after closing arguments
- reviewing cases involving supplemental jury instructions giving new theories of liability
- finding abuse of discretion when court gave “the jury a supplemental instruction on attempted battery during the jury’s deliberations, because the court at the close of evidence indicated that it would only instruct the jury on battery, the sole theory . . . elected by the State.”
- “We are not persuaded that a supplemental closing argument would have cured the problem created by the court’s eleventh hour insertion of this new theory of culpability.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins, Battaglia, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-21· cited 419×
- United States v. AlstonFourth Circuit· 2010-07-02· cited 78×
- Atkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-08-18· cited 31×
- United States v. DonnellFourth Circuit· 2011-10-27· cited 21×
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-20· cited 21×
- Appraicio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-26· cited 18×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-30· cited 15×
- State v. DEVOIDSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-09-17· cited 13×
- COLEMAN-FULLER v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 13×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 12×
- State v. BircherCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-02-23· cited 10×
- State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-06-25· cited 8×
- State v. SaylesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-01-29· cited 8×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-11-16· cited 6×
- Mulley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-06-02· cited 5×
- Bircher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-02-02· cited 4×
- Sweeney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-01· cited 4×
- Simms v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-05-01· cited 2×
- Com. v. Orie Melvin, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-21
- Juan Pablo B. v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-09-29
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,330×
- United States v. Willie HortonFourth Circuit· 1990-12-26· cited 132×
- United States v. Jeffrey Gaskins, AKA Jeffery GaskinNinth Circuit· 1988-06-17· cited 128×
- Snowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-14· cited 113×
- Lamb v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-01· cited 85×
- People v. MillsapIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-01-27· cited 74×
- Lovell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-12· cited 69×
- State v. BabyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-04-16· cited 50×
- People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court· 1996-12-27· cited 48×
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-19· cited 47×
- State v. RansomCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-24· cited 33×
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-06-11· cited 33×
- Brogden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-18· cited 30×
- Yantz v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-06-15· cited 27×
- Duckworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-08-23· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.