· 12/1/2003
Malin v. Mininberg
Citations
- 837 A.2d 178
- 153 Md. App. 358
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing, in a child custody case, the substance abuse problem of father and developmental disability of his child
- vacating monetary award for new evaluation due to disposition of the alimony award
- the “trial court ‘is vested with wide discretion’ in deciding whether to award counsel fees and, if so, in what amount.”
- the party who claims a marital interest in property has the burden of proof as to the claim
- “[T]he trial court ‘is vested with wide discretion’ in deciding whether to award counsel fees and, if so, in what amount.” (quoting Dunlap v. Fiorenza, 128 Md. App. 357, 365 (1999))
- standard of review for alimony awards
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander, Sharer, Wenner, William
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.