Skip to main content
· 12/1/2003

Malin v. Mininberg

Citations

  • 837 A.2d 178
  • 153 Md. App. 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing, in a child custody case, the substance abuse problem of father and developmental disability of his child
  • vacating monetary award for new evaluation due to disposition of the alimony award
  • the “trial court ‘is vested with wide discretion’ in deciding whether to award counsel fees and, if so, in what amount.”
  • the party who claims a marital interest in property has the burden of proof as to the claim
  • “[T]he trial court ‘is vested with wide discretion’ in deciding whether to award counsel fees and, if so, in what amount.” (quoting Dunlap v. Fiorenza, 128 Md. App. 357, 365 (1999))
  • standard of review for alimony awards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander, Sharer, Wenner, William

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.