State v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \any contact between the mouth or its component parts and the vulva is sufficient to constitute the offense of cunnilingus\
• penetration is not necessary to show cunnilingus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roundtree v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-02· cited 117×
• Love v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-03-22· cited 65×
• Horton v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1998-04-17· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Benoit
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-12-08· cited 9×
• Joseph v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2012-12-14· cited 9×
• State v. Bullock
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-12-15· cited 8×
• State v. Hyler
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-07-27· cited 8×
• State v. Pollard
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-10-01· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Crawford
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1972-02-22· cited 63×
• State v. Dayton
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-03-01· cited 54×
• State v. Boyington
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-11-29· cited 41×
• State v. Oswald
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1957-11-12· cited 37×
• State v. Whitaker
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1958-03-10· cited 34×
• State v. Wellman
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1913-12-09· cited 26×
• State v. Velas
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-06-03· cited 12×
• State v. Pettijohn
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-08-30· cited 11×