Lombard v. Rohrbaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting plaintiffs cross-examination of defendant’s expert to show prior income received from defendant’s insurance company
• where general prohibition on mention of insurance interferes with litigant's right to cross-examine witness concerning interest or bias, trial court should not prohibit proper cross-examination
• where general prohibition on mention of insurance interferes with litigant's right to cross-examine witness concerning interest or bias, trial court should not prohibit proper cross-examination
• “[T]he responsibility for balancing the competing considerations of probative value and prejudice rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.”
• \[T]he responsibility for balancing the competing considerations of probative value and prejudice rests in the sound discretion of the trial court.\
• probative value of evidence that witness, although not employee of defendant’s insurer, received more than $100,000 per year in payments from that insurer outweighed possible prejudice to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).