Skip to main content

Loman v. Freeman

Citations

  • 874 N.E.2d 542
  • 375 Ill. App. 3d 445
  • 314 Ill. Dec. 446
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 1271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the substance of a motion, not its label, determines what it is
  • noting that the substance of a motion, not its label, determines what it is
  • non-practicing veterinarian who was a professor at a State school was not covered by sovereign immunity because the duty he owed derived from an “obligation to a state regulatory agency,” not from his State employment
  • noting, under §§ 278 and 892A of the Restatement (Second

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.