Jinkins v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that an action against a state employee is considered to be against the state only when: (1) there are no allegations that an employee or agent of the state acted beyond his authority through wrongful acts; (2
• sovereign immunity applies when, among other things, there are “no allegations that an agent or employee of the State acted beyond the scope of his authority through wrongful acts” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• sovereign immunity applies when, among other things, there -9- No. 1-19-0904 are “no allegations that an agent or employee of the State acted beyond the scope of his authority through wrongful acts” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• discussing the constitutional and statutory framework for Illinois sovereign immunity
• rejecting a “but-for” state employment im- munity analysis
• rejecting a “but-for” state employmént immunity analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).