Robb v. Sutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a suit against the assistant dean in his individual capacity for activities arising out of his official duties constituted a suit against the state over which the court of claims possessed exclusive jurisdiction
• holding that a suit against the assistant dean in his individual capacity for activities arising out of his official duties constituted a suit against the state over which the court of claims possessed exclusive jurisdiction
• allegations of recklessness, which connotes wilful and wanton behavior, insufficient to show defendant acted outside his authority
• judgment against state employee that operates to control actions of state or to subject it to liability is deemed action against state
• legal official acts of State agents performed within bounds of official authority or duties are normally considered acts of State; illegal acts or acts in excess of delegated authority are against agent individually
• legal official acts of State agents performed within bounds of official authority or duties are normally considered acts of State; illegal acts or acts in excess of delegated authority are against agent individually

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).