Livick v. the Gillette Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “courts which do recognize ERISA- estoppel do so only when the plan terms are ambiguous”
• holding that providing estimate of future benefits did not involve discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).