Taylor v. Peoples Natural Gas Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that \both elements necessary for the existence of apparent authority are present in this [ERISA] case\
• applying doctrine of apparent authority to determine whether individual was an agent of ERISA plan
• indicating that an employee who was authorized to advise employees of their rights and options under the ERISA plan and who was understood to be the person to speak to regarding the pension plan was acting to assist the plan administrator in discharging its fiduciary duties
• a plan administrator may be liable for the material misrepresentations made by individuals who have been selected as non-fiduciary agents by the plan administrator to assist it in its fiduciary obligation to administer a plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).