Skip to main content
· 7/28/2014

New Jersey Carpenters & the Trustees Thereof Ex Rel. Chatten v. Tishman Construction Corp.

Citations

  • 760 F.3d 297
  • 23 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 31
  • 58 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2971
  • 2014 WL 3702591
  • 200 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3184
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that LMRA did not preempt substantive claim under N.J. Prevailing Wage Act, which requires that employees engaged in public work be paid a defined prevailing wage, explaining that claim exists independently of operative CBA
  • “It is appropriate for us to reach an issue that the district court did not if the issues provide purely legal questions, upon which an appellate court exercises plenary review.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “We have held that a claim is completely preempted, and thus removable, under ERISA § 502(a) only if: (1) the plaintiff could have brought the claim under § 502(a); and (2) no other independent legal duty supports the plaintiff's claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKee, Chagares, Shwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.