Skip to main content
· 10/22/1997

James R. Penny v. United Parcel Service

Citations

  • 128 F.3d 408
  • 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 718
  • 156 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2618
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 28876
  • 1997 WL 651470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting retaliation claims that were “nothing more than a reformulation of [the plaintiff’s] failure to might fail (or vice versa
  • moderate difficul ty or pain experienced while walking does not rise to the level of a disability
  • party cannot create a genuine issue of material fact by filing an affidavit after summary judgment has been made, that contradicts the earlier deposition testimony
  • “Retaliation claims are treated the same whether brought under the ADA or Title VII.”
  • “Retaliation claims are treated the same whether brought under the ADA or Title VII.”
  • retaliation claim failed because plaintiff didn’t allege discriminatory action taken against him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lively, Kennedy, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.