District of Columbia· 8/30/2007
Liu v. Novak
Citations
- 509 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63683
- 2007 WL 2460425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding jurisdiction to review 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a) adjustments of status
- “[A]ction and inaction are distinct.”
- “[A]ction and inaction are distinct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Emmet G. Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bethney Lovo v. Loren MillerFourth Circuit· 2024-07-03· cited 32×
- Beshir v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2014-01-27· cited 30×
- Saleem v. KeislerW.D. Wisconsin· 2007-10-26· cited 22×
- Orlov v. HowardDistrict of Columbia· 2007-12-10· cited 19×
- Jafarzadeh v. DukeDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-07· cited 19×
- Aslam v. MukaseyE.D. Virginia· 2008-01-25· cited 17×
- Nigmadzhanov v. MuellerS.D. New York· 2008-05-01· cited 16×
- Geneme v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-31· cited 16×
- Sawan v. ChertoffS.D. Texas· 2008-11-18· cited 15×
- Singh v. NapolitanoDistrict of Columbia· 2010-05-11· cited 12×
- Beshir v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2011-01-24· cited 9×
- Seydi v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICESE.D. Michigan· 2011-03-28· cited 7×
- Hosseini v. NapolitanoE.D. Kentucky· 2014-04-03· cited 6×
- Martin v. LeonhartDistrict of Columbia· 2010-06-15· cited 5×
- Villa v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityN.D. New York· 2009-04-06· cited 3×
- Orabi v. ChertoffN.D. Georgia· 2007-12-27· cited 2×
- Mohammed v. SessionsD.C. Circuit· 2019-01-16· cited 1×
- SHIRMOHAMANDALI v. HeinauerE.D. California· 2008-02-22
- Mohammad v. NapolitanoDistrict of Columbia· 2009-12-18
- State of Wisconsin v. Dey, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 2008-02-04
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court· 1977-02-23· cited 3,951×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 2,484×
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 1,521×
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court· 1999-02-24· cited 1,485×
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesD.C. Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 1,322×
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-13· cited 605×
- Richard Atchinson v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1996-01-19· cited 478×
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 393×
- Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council, Inc. v. NortonD.C. Circuit· 2003-08-08· cited 393×
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 320×
- Oyenike Alaka v. Attorney General of the United States Secretary of Department of Homeland SecurityThird Circuit· 2006-08-23· cited 218×
- Sierra Club v. Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, American Mining Congress, National Coal Association, IntervenorsD.C. Circuit· 1987-09-08· cited 215×
- Hakim Iddir v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-06· cited 168×
- Rann v. ChaoDistrict of Columbia· 2001-08-20· cited 113×
- Charles Kibaara Nyaga, Doin Kainyu Kibaara v. Joh Ashcroft, Rosemary MelvilleEleventh Circuit· 2003-03-05· cited 86×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.