Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proceeding by Federal Reserve alleging unsafe banking practices fit “squarely within § 362(b)(4)”
• holding that § 1818® provides “clear and convincing evidence” of congressional intent to strip jurisdiction
• holding that a defendant is constitutionally prohibited from engaging in purposeful racial discrimination when exercising peremptory challenges
• holding that, when deciding whether a governmental action falls within the exception, courts should not “determine whether the proposed [action] is legitimate” or “scrutinize the validity” of the proposed action
• holding that “central to our decision in Kyne was the fact the [agency’s] interpretation ... would wholly deprive the [party] of a meaningful and adequate means of vindicating it statutory rights”
• recognizing that deprivation of meaningful and adequate means of vindicating rights was central to Leedom and finding no Leedom deprivation where rights could be vindicated in Circuit Court pursuant to statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).