Roth v. Roth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exploring the level of specificity required to plainly indicate the elimination of a status as beneficiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Layne v. Layne
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-13· cited 7×
• Manufacturers Life Insurance Ex Rel. North American Life Assurance Co. v. Dougherty
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-12-11· cited 4×
• Kirsop v. Public School Employes' Retirement Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-07· cited 3×
• Prudential v. Cushman
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-21
• Regional Home Care, Inc. v. IKON Office Solutions, Inc.
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2011-10-21
• Wichek v. Wichek
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-03-29

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Litwack v. Litwack
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-07· cited 49×
• Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Stitzel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-07· cited 29×
• Wertz v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-02· cited 27×
• Lipschutz v. Lipschutz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-01-19· cited 24×