Luber v. Luber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the husband’s assertion of his inability to pay in accordance with a settlement agreement did not qualify for a defense of impossibility of -6- J-S22008-21 performance and did not constitute a basis for discharging his obligations under the agreement
• “a party generally assumes the risk of his own inability to perform his contractual duties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).