Lindsey v. Dempsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that university employees cannot interfere with a coach’s contract with the 23 university, because those employees were acting on behalf of the university
• “Since the ruling of which Lindsey complains occurred after the entry of judgment and the filing of the notice of appeal, we do not have jurisdiction to address it.”
• “Since the ruling of which [appellant] complains occurred after the entry of judgment and the filing of the notice of appeal, we do not have jurisdiction to address it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).